On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 14:23:33 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote:
> Add mempool allocations for struct kmemleak_object and > kmemleak_scan_area as slightly more resilient than kmem_cache_alloc() > under memory pressure. Additionally, mask out all the gfp flags passed > to kmemleak other than GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ATOMIC. > > A boot-time tuning parameter (kmemleak.mempool) is added to allow a > different minimum pool size (defaulting to NR_CPUS * 4). btw, the checkpatch warnings are valid: WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc #70: FILE: mm/kmemleak.c:197: +static int min_object_pool = NR_CPUS * 4; WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc #71: FILE: mm/kmemleak.c:198: +static int min_scan_area_pool = NR_CPUS * 1; There can be situations where NR_CPUS is much larger than num_possible_cpus(). Can we initialize these tunables within kmemleak_init()?
