On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:20 -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> The assumption that we have an overall irqs_pending flags,
> and a one-to-one lguest <-> task mapping fails to hold on x86_64,
> where we can have multiple puppies, aka vcpus.
> 
> Although ifdefs could be used, it makes the code much more
> unreadable, and other ports are on the way, anyway. So some sort
> of acessor is preferred anyway.

I'd prefer to see the i386 code use vcpus too.  Even if i386 only has
one at present, it's cleaner.

Of course, there'll be a lot of "s/lg/vcpu/" churn, but that's OK.

Thanks,
Rusty.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to