By the time lpuart_shutdown() calls lpuart_stop_tx() UARTCR2_TE and
UARTCR2_TIE (which the latter will clear) are already cleared, so that
function call should effectively be a no-op. Moreso, lpuart_stop_tx()
is expected to be executed with port spinlock held, which the caller
doesn't. Given all that, drop the call to lpuart_stop_tx() in
lpuart_shutdown().
In case of lpuart32_shutdown()/lpuart32_stop_tx(), TIE won't even be
set if lpuart_dma_tx_use is true. Drop it there as well.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>
Cc: Chris Healy <cphe...@gmail.com>
Cc: Cory Tusar <cory.tu...@zii.aero>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.com>
Cc: linux-...@nxp.com
Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
index e59dd90fc34c..2597a877d639 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
@@ -1574,8 +1574,6 @@ static void lpuart_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
sport->dma_tx_in_progress = false;
dmaengine_terminate_all(sport->dma_tx_chan);
}
-
- lpuart_stop_tx(port);
}
}
@@ -1607,8 +1605,6 @@ static void lpuart32_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
sport->dma_tx_in_progress = false;
dmaengine_terminate_all(sport->dma_tx_chan);
}
-
- lpuart32_stop_tx(port);
}
}
--
2.21.0
