Hi Oleksij,

Thanks for review

<snip>

>
> your patch is in conflicht with Richard's Zhu <hongxing....@nxp.com>
> patch "[PATCH v3] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu".
> Please sync your works.

Sent an email to Richard. Hopefully he can rebase his change on my patches.

<snip>

>
> Looks like here is one more bug "from the beginning of times" :)
> The imx_mu_xcr_rmw() should disable only one channel depending on the
> type of channel.
>
> It should be:
>         switch (cp->type) {
>         case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
>                 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
>                 break;
>         case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
>                 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
>                 break;
>         case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
>                 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
>                 break;
>         default:
>                 break;

Honestly, this is not really a bug. The registers are expected to
already be cleared.
Also, please mind that we shouldn't clear TIE here because it should be cleared
in the mu_isr.

Anyhow, I have sent the patches with your exact suggestion to Richard.

>         }
>
> Right now I'm on vocation and have nothing against, if you'll provide
> this fix.

Have a nice vacation and thanks for the review.

Reply via email to