From: Jann Horn <ja...@google.com>

commit 16d51a590a8ce3befb1308e0e7ab77f3b661af33 upstream.

When going through execve(), zero out the NUMA fault statistics instead of
freeing them.

During execve, the task is reachable through procfs and the scheduler. A
concurrent /proc/*/sched reader can read data from a freed ->numa_faults
allocation (confirmed by KASAN) and write it back to userspace.
I believe that it would also be possible for a use-after-free read to occur
through a race between a NUMA fault and execve(): task_numa_fault() can
lead to task_numa_compare(), which invokes task_weight() on the currently
running task of a different CPU.

Another way to fix this would be to make ->numa_faults RCU-managed or add
extra locking, but it seems easier to wipe the NUMA fault statistics on
execve.

Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <ja...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
Fixes: 82727018b0d3 ("sched/numa: Call task_numa_free() from do_execve()")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152047.14424-1-ja...@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/exec.c             |    2 +-
 include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++--
 kernel/fork.c         |    2 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c   |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1642,7 +1642,7 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, st
        current->fs->in_exec = 0;
        current->in_execve = 0;
        acct_update_integrals(current);
-       task_numa_free(current);
+       task_numa_free(current, false);
        free_bprm(bprm);
        kfree(pathbuf);
        putname(filename);
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ extern int arch_task_struct_size __read_
 extern void task_numa_fault(int last_node, int node, int pages, int flags);
 extern pid_t task_numa_group_id(struct task_struct *p);
 extern void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled);
-extern void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p);
+extern void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p, bool final);
 extern bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page 
*page,
                                        int src_nid, int dst_cpu);
 #else
@@ -1875,7 +1875,7 @@ static inline pid_t task_numa_group_id(s
 static inline void set_numabalancing_state(bool enabled)
 {
 }
-static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p, bool final)
 {
 }
 static inline bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p,
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ void __put_task_struct(struct task_struc
        WARN_ON(tsk == current);
 
        cgroup_free(tsk);
-       task_numa_free(tsk);
+       task_numa_free(tsk, true);
        security_task_free(tsk);
        exit_creds(tsk);
        delayacct_tsk_free(tsk);
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2054,13 +2054,23 @@ no_join:
        return;
 }
 
-void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
+/*
+ * Get rid of NUMA staticstics associated with a task (either current or dead).
+ * If @final is set, the task is dead and has reached refcount zero, so we can
+ * safely free all relevant data structures. Otherwise, there might be
+ * concurrent reads from places like load balancing and procfs, and we should
+ * reset the data back to default state without freeing ->numa_faults.
+ */
+void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p, bool final)
 {
        struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group;
-       void *numa_faults = p->numa_faults;
+       unsigned long *numa_faults = p->numa_faults;
        unsigned long flags;
        int i;
 
+       if (!numa_faults)
+               return;
+
        if (grp) {
                spin_lock_irqsave(&grp->lock, flags);
                for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++)
@@ -2073,8 +2083,14 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *
                put_numa_group(grp);
        }
 
-       p->numa_faults = NULL;
-       kfree(numa_faults);
+       if (final) {
+               p->numa_faults = NULL;
+               kfree(numa_faults);
+       } else {
+               p->total_numa_faults = 0;
+               for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++)
+                       numa_faults[i] = 0;
+       }
 }
 
 /*


Reply via email to