[ Upstream commit 3285170f28a850638794cdfe712eb6d93e51e706 ]

Commit 372e722ea4dd4ca1 ("gpiolib: use descriptors internally") renamed
the functions to use a "gpiod" prefix, and commit 79a9becda8940deb
("gpiolib: export descriptor-based GPIO interface") introduced the "raw"
variants, but both changes forgot to update the comments.

Readd a similar reference to gpiod_set_value(), which was accidentally
removed by commit 1e77fc82110ac36f ("gpio: Add missing open drain/source
handling to gpiod_set_value_cansleep()").

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 9e2fe12c2858..a3251faa3ed8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -2411,7 +2411,7 @@ static int _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc 
*desc)
 int gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
        VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
-       /* Should be using gpio_get_value_cansleep() */
+       /* Should be using gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep() */
        WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
        return _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
 }
@@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
        int value;
 
        VALIDATE_DESC(desc);
-       /* Should be using gpio_get_value_cansleep() */
+       /* Should be using gpiod_get_value_cansleep() */
        WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
 
        value = _gpiod_get_raw_value(desc);
@@ -2608,7 +2608,7 @@ void gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool 
can_sleep,
 void gpiod_set_raw_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
 {
        VALIDATE_DESC_VOID(desc);
-       /* Should be using gpiod_set_value_cansleep() */
+       /* Should be using gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep() */
        WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep);
        _gpiod_set_raw_value(desc, value);
 }
-- 
2.20.1



Reply via email to