On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:25:37 +0800 Chuhong Yuan <hsleste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add strncmp() to Documentation/process/deprecated.rst since > using strncmp() to check whether a string starts with a > prefix is error-prone. > The safe replacement is str_has_prefix(). Is that the *only* use of strncmp()? > Also add check to the newly introduced deprecated_string_apis > in checkpatch.pl. > > This patch depends on patch: > "Documentation/checkpatch: Prefer stracpy/strscpy over > strcpy/strlcpy/strncpy." > > Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hsleste...@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 8 ++++++++ > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 + > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > index 56280e108d5a..22d3f0dbcf61 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst > @@ -109,6 +109,14 @@ the given limit of bytes to copy. This is inefficient > and can lead to > linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The > safe replacement is stracpy() or strscpy(). > > +strncmp() > +--------- > +:c:func:`strncmp` is often used to test if a string starts with a prefix Please don't use :c:func: anymore; just say strncmp() and the right things will happen. Thanks, jon
