On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:33 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/08/19 09:47, Anup Patel wrote:
> > +             if (!kvm_riscv_vcpu_has_interrupt(vcpu)) {
>
> This can be kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable instead, since kvm_vcpu_block will
> check it anyway before sleeping.

I think we can skip this check here because kvm_vcpu_block() is
checking it anyway. Agree ??

Regards,
Anup

Reply via email to