On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:33 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 02/08/19 09:47, Anup Patel wrote: > > + if (!kvm_riscv_vcpu_has_interrupt(vcpu)) { > > This can be kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable instead, since kvm_vcpu_block will > check it anyway before sleeping.
I think we can skip this check here because kvm_vcpu_block() is checking it anyway. Agree ?? Regards, Anup