On 8/6/19 10:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 02-08-19 13:44:38, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ba9138a4a1de..53a35c526e43 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2429,8 +2429,12 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t 
gfp_mask,
                                schedule_work(&memcg->high_work);
                                break;
                        }
-                       current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch;
-                       set_notify_resume(current);
+                       if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask)) {
+                               reclaim_high(memcg, nr_pages, GFP_KERNEL);

ups, this should be s@GFP_KERNEL@gfp_mask@

+                       } else {
+                               current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += batch;
+                               set_notify_resume(current);
+                       }
                        break;
                }
        } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));


Should I send an official patch for this?


I prefer to keep it as is while we have no better solution.

Reply via email to