On 30/07/2019 23:56, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-tango.c
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-tango.c
>> index 21a208da3f59..b87aa9041480 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-tango.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-tango.c
>> @@ -273,10 +273,8 @@ static int tango_pcie_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> writel_relaxed(0, pcie->base + SMP8759_ENABLE + offset);
>>
>> virq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
>> - if (virq <= 0) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map IRQ\n");
>> + if (virq <= 0)
>> return -ENXIO;
>
> Why <= 0 and -ENXIO?
Smirk. I remember discussing this in the past...
Here it is:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10006651/
A) AFAIU platform_get_irq() = 0 signals an error.
https://yarchive.net/comp/linux/zero.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/9/212
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/486056/
B) I don't remember why I picked ENXIO.
Perhaps it made more sense to me (at the time) than EINVAL or ENODEV.
Regards.
