Hi Quentin,

On 8/8/19 6:32 PM, Quentin Perret wrote:
Hi Douglas,

On Thursday 08 Aug 2019 at 14:18:57 (+0100), Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
Add calls to arch_set_freq_scale() in qcom-cpufreq-hw driver to enable
frequency invariance.

Is there a patch 2/2 ?

That slipped through when format-patch-ing unrelated commits, there is no 2nd 
patch.


Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 10 +++++++++-
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c 
b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 4b0b50403901..3bd3b8b268d9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct 
cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                        unsigned int index)
  {
        void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
+       unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg); + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
+                           policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
        return 0;
  }
@@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
  {
        void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
        int index;
+       unsigned long freq;
index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
        if (index < 0)
@@ -70,7 +74,11 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct 
cpufreq_policy *policy,
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg); - return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+       freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+       arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
+                           policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
+
+       return freq;
  }
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
--
2.22.0

Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Quentin


Thanks,
Douglas

Reply via email to