On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:48:19 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an error message with 2.6.23-rc6. > > This did not happen with 2.6.22. > > Another one for Michal's dirt file. No, I think it's the module ordering again. > > 2.6.23-rc6 boot.msg extract ( hub/usb ) I wish users stopped this filtering, it's a very bad idea. As it is, there's no message showing when ehci_hcd was loaded. We can try piece together the picture: > > <6>usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > > <6>hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found > > <6>hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected > > <6>usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > > <6>hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found > > <6>hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected > > <6>usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 ok this was ohci_hcd > > <3>usb 1-1: device not accepting address 2, error -62 > > <6>usb 5-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 was ehci here? We don't know but I bet it was, because: > > <6>usb 6-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 > > 2.6.22 boot.msg extract ( hub/usb ) This one seems far shorter. The EHCI comes online late here as well, but not as late as in the "regression" case. I am wondering if we have some kind of "parallel PCI probing" option in action here. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/