Hi, On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options > > > due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols. > > > > Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is not changable, but still > > visible, a select is usually involved. > > On i86_64 (but I think the arch does not matter). > make defconfig > make menuconfig > > At top-level menu I see: > --- Enable the block layer ---> > > In block/Kconfig we have: > menuconfig BLOCK > bool "Enable the block layer" if EMBEDDED > default y > > If EMBEDDED == n then we see the above. > And this was my first experience with this patch - and it > took me some thoughts to realise it was the "if EMBEDDED" part > that made it look like -*- Indeed, I forgot about this case. Here it's actually the menu entry of a symbol that is forced to be visible, because a child entry is visible. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
