On 8/15/2019 9:22 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: SNIPstatic void hpp__entry_unpair(struct hist_entry *he, int idx, char *buf, size_t size) { @@ -1662,6 +1794,10 @@ static void data__hpp_register(struct data__file *d, int idx) fmt->color = hpp__color_cycles; fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_nop; break; + case PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST: + fmt->color = hpp__color_cycles_hist; + fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_nop; + break; default: fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_nop; break; @@ -1688,8 +1824,15 @@ static int ui_init(void) * PERF_HPP_DIFF__RATIO * PERF_HPP_DIFF__WEIGHTED_DIFF */ - data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] : - PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); + if (cycles_hist && (compute == COMPUTE_CYCLES)) { + data__hpp_register(d, i ? PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES : + PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); + data__hpp_register(d, i ? PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST : + PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); + } else { + data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] : + PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); + }I tink that something like this might be less confusing instead of above: if (cycles_hist && i && (compute == COMPUTE_CYCLES)) data__hpp_register(d, PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES); other than that the patch looks ok to me jirka
Yes, your code is more beautiful. Thanks so much! :) Thanks Jin Yao

