On 8/15/2019 9:22 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

  static void
  hpp__entry_unpair(struct hist_entry *he, int idx, char *buf, size_t size)
  {
@@ -1662,6 +1794,10 @@ static void data__hpp_register(struct data__file *d, int 
idx)
                fmt->color = hpp__color_cycles;
                fmt->sort  = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
                break;
+       case PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST:
+               fmt->color = hpp__color_cycles_hist;
+               fmt->sort  = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
+               break;
        default:
                fmt->sort  = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
                break;
@@ -1688,8 +1824,15 @@ static int ui_init(void)
                 *   PERF_HPP_DIFF__RATIO
                 *   PERF_HPP_DIFF__WEIGHTED_DIFF
                 */
-               data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] :
-                                         PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE);
+               if (cycles_hist && (compute == COMPUTE_CYCLES)) {
+                       data__hpp_register(d, i ? PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES :
+                                                 PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE);
+                       data__hpp_register(d, i ? PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST :
+                                                 PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE);
+               } else {
+                       data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] :
+                                                 PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE);
+               }

I tink that something like this might be less confusing instead of above:

                 if (cycles_hist && i && (compute == COMPUTE_CYCLES))
                         data__hpp_register(d, PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES);

other than that the patch looks ok to me

jirka


Yes, your code is more beautiful. Thanks so much! :)

Thanks
Jin Yao

Reply via email to