> Yes, I believe the integration is neccessary. Using same binding is > neccessary for that, but not sufficient. For example, we need > compatible trigger names, too.
Hi Pavel
Please could you explain what you mean by compatible trigger names?
> So... I'd really like to see proper integration is possible before we
> merge this.
Please let me turn that around. What do you see as being impossible at
the moment? What do we need to convince you about?
Thanks
Andrew
