On 8/20/2019 4:34 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:13:43AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: SNIPstatic void hpp__entry_unpair(struct hist_entry *he, int idx, char *buf, size_t size) { @@ -1662,6 +1794,10 @@ static void data__hpp_register(struct data__file *d, int idx) fmt->color = hpp__color_cycles; fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_nop; break; + case PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST: + fmt->color = hpp__color_cycles_hist; + fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_nop; + break; default: fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_nop; break; @@ -1688,8 +1824,13 @@ static int ui_init(void) * PERF_HPP_DIFF__RATIO * PERF_HPP_DIFF__WEIGHTED_DIFF */ - data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] : - PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); + if (cycles_hist && i && (compute == COMPUTE_CYCLES)) { + data__hpp_register(d, PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES); + data__hpp_register(d, PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST); + } else { + data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] : + PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); + }hum, why can't it be just like we treat other extra columns: --- @@ -1687,6 +1823,7 @@ static int ui_init(void) * PERF_HPP_DIFF__DELTA * PERF_HPP_DIFF__RATIO * PERF_HPP_DIFF__WEIGHTED_DIFF + * PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES */ data__hpp_register(d, i ? compute_2_hpp[compute] : PERF_HPP_DIFF__BASELINE); @@ -1704,6 +1841,9 @@ static int ui_init(void) if (show_period) data__hpp_register(d, i ? PERF_HPP_DIFF__PERIOD : PERF_HPP_DIFF__PERIOD_BASELINE); + + if (cycles_hist && i) + data__hpp_register(d, PERF_HPP_DIFF__CYCLES_HIST); thanks, jirka
Hi Jiri, Yes, thanks, your code is better. Thanks so much! Thanks Jin Yao

