On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 05:05:22PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/08/19 09:03, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > +
> > +int kvm_mmu_get_subpages(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_subpage *spp_info,
> > +                    bool mmu_locked)
> > +{
> > +   u32 *access = spp_info->access_map;
> > +   gfn_t gfn = spp_info->base_gfn;
> > +   int npages = spp_info->npages;
> > +   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> > +   int i;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   if (!kvm->arch.spp_active)
> > +         return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +   if (!mmu_locked)
> > +         spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +
> 
> Do not add this argument.  Just lock mmu_lock in the callers.
> 
> Paolo
OK, will remove it, thanks!

Reply via email to