Since BPF constant blinding is performed after the verifier pass, the
ALU32 instructions inserted for doubleword immediate loads don't have a
corresponding zext instruction. This is causing a kernel oops on powerpc
and can be reproduced by running 'test_cgroup_storage' with
bpf_jit_harden=2.
Fix this by emitting BPF_ZEXT during constant blinding if
prog->aux->verifier_zext is set.
Fixes: a4b1d3c1ddf6cb ("bpf: verifier: insert zero extension according to
analysis result")
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changes since RFC:
- Removed changes to ALU32 and JMP32 ops since those don't alter program
execution, and the verifier would have already accounted for them.
kernel/bpf/core.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 8191a7db2777..66088a9e9b9e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
const struct bpf_insn *aux,
- struct bpf_insn *to_buff)
+ struct bpf_insn *to_buff,
+ bool emit_zext)
{
struct bpf_insn *to = to_buff;
u32 imm_rnd = get_random_int();
@@ -1005,6 +1006,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
case 0: /* Part 2 of BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW. */
*to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd ^
aux[0].imm);
*to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd);
+ if (emit_zext)
+ *to++ = BPF_ZEXT_REG(BPF_REG_AX);
*to++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, aux[0].dst_reg, BPF_REG_AX);
break;
@@ -1088,7 +1091,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog
*prog)
insn[1].code == 0)
memcpy(aux, insn, sizeof(aux));
- rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff);
+ rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff,
+ clone->aux->verifier_zext);
if (!rewritten)
continue;
--
2.22.0
