Instead of using task_cputime and doing the addition of utime and stime at
all call sites, it's way simpler to have a sample array which allows
indexed based checks against the expiry cache array.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -202,6 +202,32 @@ static u64 cpu_clock_sample(const clocki
return 0;
}
+static inline void store_samples(u64 *samples, u64 stime, u64 utime, u64 rtime)
+{
+ samples[CPUCLOCK_PROF] = stime + utime;
+ samples[CPUCLOCK_VIRT] = utime;
+ samples[CPUCLOCK_SCHED] = rtime;
+}
+
+static void task_sample_cputime(struct task_struct *p, u64 *samples)
+{
+ u64 stime, utime;
+
+ task_cputime(p, &utime, &stime);
+ store_samples(samples, stime, utime, p->se.sum_exec_runtime);
+}
+
+static void proc_sample_cputime_atomic(struct task_cputime_atomic *at,
+ u64 *samples)
+{
+ u64 stime, utime, rtime;
+
+ utime = atomic64_read(&at->utime);
+ stime = atomic64_read(&at->stime);
+ rtime = atomic64_read(&at->sum_exec_runtime);
+ store_samples(samples, stime, utime, rtime);
+}
+
/*
* Set cputime to sum_cputime if sum_cputime > cputime. Use cmpxchg
* to avoid race conditions with concurrent updates to cputime.
