On 8/21/19 7:42 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-08-19, 16:16, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Instead of printing the policy, which is incidentally a kernel pointer,
>> so with limited interest, print the cpufreq driver name that failed to
>> be suspend, which is more useful for debugging.
>>
>> Fixes: 2f0aea936360 ("cpufreq: suspend governors on system
>> suspend/hibernate")
>
> I will drop this tag as this isn't a bug really.
Indeed, that was a bit too trigger happy on my side. Thanks!
>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index c28ebf2810f1..330d789f81fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -1807,8 +1807,8 @@ void cpufreq_suspend(void)
>> }
>>
>> if (cpufreq_driver->suspend && cpufreq_driver->suspend(policy))
>> - pr_err("%s: Failed to suspend driver: %p\n", __func__,
>> - policy);
>> + pr_err("%s: Failed to suspend driver: %s\n", __func__,
>> + cpufreq_driver->name);
>> }
>>
>> suspend:
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
>
--
Florian
