On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:23:57PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote: > Some functions don't have standard stack-frames but are intended > this way. In order for objtool to ignore those particular cases > we add a macro that enables us to annotate the cases we chose > to mark as particular. > > Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/frame.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/frame.h b/include/linux/frame.h > index 02d3ca2d9598..1e35e58ab259 100644 > --- a/include/linux/frame.h > +++ b/include/linux/frame.h > @@ -11,14 +11,31 @@ > * > * For more information, see > tools/objtool/Documentation/stack-validation.txt. > */ > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > #define STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(func) \ > static void __used __section(.discard.func_stack_frame_non_standard) \ > *__func_stack_frame_non_standard_##func = func > +#else > + /* > + * This macro is the arm64 assembler equivalent of the > + * macro STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD define at > + * ~/include/linux/frame.h > + */
This comment is a bit confusing as it's referring to its own header file. And it's not arm64-specific. I don't think we really need a comment here anyway. > + .macro asm_stack_frame_non_standard func > + .pushsection ".discard.func_stack_frame_non_standard" > + .quad \func > + .popsection > + .endm Can you call it STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD for consistency with the non-asm version? -- Josh
