On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:23:58PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> This code doesn't respect the Arm PCS but it is intended this
> way. Adapting it to respect the PCS would result in altering the
> behaviour.
> 
> In order to suppress objtool's warnings, we setup a stack frame
> for __cpu_suspend_enter and annotate cpu_resume and _cpu_resume
> as having non-standard stack frames.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault <raphael.ga...@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> index f5b04dd8a710..55c7c099d32c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/frame.h>
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
> @@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_suspend_enter)
>       str     x0, [x1]
>       add     x0, x0, #SLEEP_STACK_DATA_SYSTEM_REGS
>       stp     x29, lr, [sp, #-16]!
> +     mov     x29, sp
>       bl      cpu_do_suspend
>       ldp     x29, lr, [sp], #16
>       mov     x0, #1
> @@ -146,3 +148,6 @@ ENTRY(_cpu_resume)
>       mov     x0, #0
>       ret
>  ENDPROC(_cpu_resume)
> +
> +     asm_stack_frame_non_standard cpu_resume
> +     asm_stack_frame_non_standard _cpu_resume

We usually put these annotations immediately after the functions they're
annotating.  And they should resemble the C macros like

  STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(cpu_resume)

-- 
Josh

Reply via email to