On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:39:21AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:09:56AM +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: > > should say that it is obsolete. I think obsolete means "you should never > > ever have to use this stuff". > > Agreed. I think that LP_CAREFUL is still needed. There are printers that think that nFault overrides the other error lines and there are printers that drag nFault to 'okay to print' when off. To keep everyone happy (those that want to print to error-line-wreckless printers, and those that want jobs being sent to a printer that's off to wait until the printer comes online) I think we need LP_CAREFUL to remain. Tim. */
- Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease Peter Osterlund
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerel... Peter Osterlund
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.... Peter Osterlund
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line printe... Peter Osterlund
- Re: Printing to off-line pr... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line pr... Tim Waugh
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in... Tim Waugh
- Re: Printing to off-line printe... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerelease Tim Waugh
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-prerel... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.0-pr... Tim Waugh
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in... Tim Waugh
- Re: Printing to off-line printe... Peter Osterlund
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in 2.4.... Peter Osterlund
- Re: Printing to off-line printer in... Tim Waugh