Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com> writes:
> Move the stat.mmio_exits update into x86_emulate_instruction(). This is
> both a bug fix, e.g. the current update flows will incorrectly increment
> mmio_exits on emulation failure, and a preparatory change to set the
> stage for eliminating EMULATE_DONE and company.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
This, however, makes me wonder why this is handled in x86-specific code
in the first place, can we just count KVM_EXIT_MMIO exits when handling
KVM_RUN?
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 --
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 -
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 4c45ff0cfbd0..845e39d8a970 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -5437,8 +5437,6 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t
> cr2, u64 error_code,
> case EMULATE_DONE:
> return 1;
> case EMULATE_USER_EXIT:
> - ++vcpu->stat.mmio_exits;
> - /* fall through */
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> return 0;
> default:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 570a233e272b..18286e5b5983 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -5200,7 +5200,6 @@ static int handle_invalid_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu)
> err = kvm_emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0);
>
> if (err == EMULATE_USER_EXIT) {
> - ++vcpu->stat.mmio_exits;
> ret = 0;
> goto out;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b4cfd786d0b6..cd425f54096a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6598,6 +6598,8 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
> r = EMULATE_USER_EXIT;
> } else if (vcpu->mmio_needed) {
> + ++vcpu->stat.mmio_exits;
> +
> if (!vcpu->mmio_is_write)
> writeback = false;
> r = EMULATE_USER_EXIT;
--
Vitaly
