Alejandro González wrote:
> This patch allows userspace to set up wakeup alarms on any RTC handled by the
> sun6i driver, and adds the necessary PM operations to allow resuming from
> suspend when the configured wakeup alarm fires a IRQ. Of course, that the
> device actually resumes depends on the suspend state and how a particular
> hardware reacts to it, but that is out of scope for this patch.
>
> I've tested these changes on a Pine H64 model B, which contains a
> Allwinner H6 SoC, with the help of CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND kernel option.
> These are the interesting outputs from the kernel and commands which
> show that it works. As every RTC handled by this driver is largely the
> same, I think that it shouldn't introduce any regression on other SoCs,
> but I may be wrong.
>
> [ 1.092705] PM: test RTC wakeup from 'freeze' suspend
> [ 1.098230] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
> [ 1.212907] PM: suspend devices took 0.080 seconds
> (The SoC freezes for some seconds)
> [ 3.197604] PM: resume devices took 0.104 seconds
> [ 3.215937] PM: suspend exit
>
> [ 1.092812] PM: test RTC wakeup from 'mem' suspend
> [ 1.098089] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> [ 1.102033] PM: suspend exit
> [ 1.105205] PM: suspend test failed, error -22
>
> In any case, the RTC alarm interrupt gets fired as exptected:
>
> $ echo +5 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm && sleep 5 && grep rtc
> /proc/interrupts
> 29: 1 0 0 0 GICv2 133 Level
> 7000000.rtc
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro González <alejandro.gonzalez.cor...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> index c0e75c373605..b7611e5dea3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,33 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops sun6i_rtc_ops = {
> .alarm_irq_enable = sun6i_rtc_alarm_irq_enable
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +/* Enable IRQ wake on suspend, to wake up from RTC. */
> +static int sun6i_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sun6i_rtc_dev *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
> + enable_irq_wake(chip->irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Disable IRQ wake on resume. */
> +static int sun6i_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sun6i_rtc_dev *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
> + disable_irq_wake(chip->irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sun6i_rtc_pm_ops,
> + sun6i_rtc_suspend, sun6i_rtc_resume);
> +
> static int sun6i_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct sun6i_rtc_dev *chip = sun6i_rtc;
> @@ -650,6 +677,8 @@ static int sun6i_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> clk_prepare_enable(chip->losc);
>
> + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> +
> chip->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, "rtc-sun6i",
> &sun6i_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> if (IS_ERR(chip->rtc)) {
> @@ -684,6 +713,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sun6i_rtc_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "sun6i-rtc",
> .of_match_table = sun6i_rtc_dt_ids,
> + .pm = &sun6i_rtc_pm_ops,
> },
> };
> builtin_platform_driver(sun6i_rtc_driver);
>
I'd be grateful if someone can test this patch on different boards to the Pine
H64 model B. I'm afraid that board is the only one I have to test this.
Regards.
