On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Aug 23, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > > > >> On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > >>>> On Aug 23, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>>> On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >>>>>> On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Sebastian Mayr wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -static inline int sizeof_long(void) > > >>>>>> +static inline int sizeof_long(struct pt_regs *regs) > > >>>>>> { > > >>>>>> - return in_ia32_syscall() ? 4 : 8; > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This wants a comment. > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> + return user_64bit_mode(regs) ? 8 : 4; > > >>>> > > >>>> The more simpler one liner is to check > > >>>> > > >>>> test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) > > >>> > > >>> I still want to finish killing TIF_IA32 some day. Let’s please not add > > >>> new users. > > >> > > >> Well, yes and no. This needs to be backported .... > > > > > > And TBH the magic in user_64bit_mode() is not pretty either. > > > > > It’s only magic on Xen. I should probably stick a > > cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XENPV) in there instead. > > For backporting sake I really prefer the TIF version. One usage site more > is not the end of the world. We can add the user_64bit_mode() variant from > Sebastian on top as a cleanup right away so mainline is clean.
Bah, scratch it. I take the proper one right away.