On (08/28/19 02:31), Brendan Higgins wrote:
[..]
> Previously KUnit assumed that printk would always be present, which is
> not a valid assumption to make. Fix that by removing call to
> vprintk_emit, and calling printk directly.
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0352fae9-564f-4a97-715a-fabe01625...@kernel.org/T/#t
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.w...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhigg...@google.com>
[..]
> -static void kunit_vprintk(const struct kunit *test,
> - const char *level,
> - struct va_format *vaf)
> -{
> - kunit_printk_emit(level[1] - '0', "\t# %s: %pV", test->name, vaf);
> -}
This patch looks good to me. I like the removal of recursive
vsprintf() (%pV).
-ss
