On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:52:23AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > That's why they exmaples should not be hidden/embedded in .txt files; > > they should be standalone .c files with makefiles etc. > > Yes. And most importantly integrated with the kernel build system. > > > and they can be taken out of Documentation/ whenever they go into > > util-linux-ng or elsewhere. Let's get the order correct. > > Well, this is kernel code - so util-linux is not the solution here > obviously :)
Can you sketch what you have in mind. We right now have said we wnated to: 1) include a framework for executing simple new-syscall-test-stubs 2) have a nice place for kernel example code I could come up with something but I expect you already have something in your mind where to put stuff. If I have a rough idea I can start looking into the kbuild bits of it. Not that I will have it ready within the next two weeks but nice buffer when I anyway drop sleeping.. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/