From: <wang.y...@zte.com.cn> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:50:08 +0800 (CST)
> We used an older version of the kernel, and found that configuring default > route led to a lot of NS messages, which affected the real business. > > Although commit f547fac624be adds rate-limiting, there are still some > unreasonable things. > > We have tested this change on CentOS 7.6 (3.10.0-957), whose rt6_probe() > implementation is similar to the latest code. When remaking patch based on > linux-5.3-rc5, a line of code was missed out with a mistack. Therefore, you are not testing this patch on current kernels, so you are sending a patch which is completely untested. This is not appropriate nor accceptable.
