On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> > > constrained_alloc calculates the size of the oom domain by using > node_spanned_pages which is incorrect because this is the full range of > the physical memory range that the numa node occupies rather than the > memory that backs that range which is represented by node_present_pages. > > Sparsely populated nodes (e.g. after memory hot remove or simply sparse > due to memory layout) can have really a large difference between the > two. This shouldn't really cause any real user observable problems > because the oom calculates a ratio against totalpages and used memory > cannot exceed present pages but it is confusing and wrong from code > point of view. > > Noticed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
