Rob, On 30/08/2019 1.47, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:56:17PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Similarly to paRAM slots, channels can be used by other cores. >> >> Add optional property to configure the reserved channel ranges. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt >> index 4bbc94d829c8..1198682ada99 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt >> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ Optional properties: >> - ti,edma-reserved-slot-ranges: PaRAM slot ranges which should not be used >> by >> the driver, they are allocated to be used by for example the >> DSP. See example. >> +- ti,edma-reserved-chan-ranges: channel ranges which should not be used by >> + the driver, they are allocated to be used by for example the >> + DSP. See example. > > Based on the other thread, I think extending dma-channel-mask to a > uint32-array makes sense here.
Yes, that is the reason I have asked on that and I'm in progress of converting the edma driver to use the dma-channel-mask. Just need to do some shuffling in the driver to get the mask in a form usable by the driver. I'll send an updated series early next week. - Péter Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
