On 8/22/19 3:58 PM, Alakesh Haloi wrote:
Without this patch we see following error while building and kselftest
for secccomp_bpf fails.
seccomp_bpf.c:1787:20: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’ undeclared (first
use in this function);
seccomp_bpf.c:1788:6: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT’ undeclared (first
use in this function);
Signed-off-by: Alakesh Haloi <alakesh.ha...@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 6ef7f16c4cf5..2e619760fc3e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1353,6 +1353,14 @@ TEST_F(precedence, log_is_fifth_in_any_order)
#define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 7
#endif
+#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY
+#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY 1
+#endif
+
+#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT
+#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT 2
+#endif
+
#define IS_SECCOMP_EVENT(status) ((status >> 16) == PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)
bool tracer_running;
void tracer_stop(int sig)
Hi Kees,
Okay to apply this one for 5.4-rc1. Or is this going through bpf tree?
If it is going through bpf tree:
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
