Hi Valdis,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:16:28 EDT, Kyle Moffett said: > > > I am assuming that if the laptop has sufficiently important data on > > it to warrant the above steps then I am also clueful enough to: > > (A) Not carry the laptop around unsecured areas, > > (B) Keep a close enough eye on it and be aware that it's gone by > > the time they get to step 2, OR > > (C) Pay somebody to build me a better physical chassis for my laptop > > Building a better chassis can be a challenge when the threat model really > *does* include attacks by a well-funded TLA. > > http://www.epic.org/crypto/scarfo/murch_aff.pdf Thanks for the link! And this was ... 1999 (!) Probably goes without saying that physical hacking tricks have only become even more refined/ perfected by now :-) > The FBI did an *initial* entry to survey the hardware, and then a total of > *five* other entries before they actually installed it. Note the technical > and legal requirements required on the KLS (it had to, among other things, > capture PGP passphrases but *not* anything that was typed online). Thanks, Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/