On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:32:40AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Add a test for the %pfw printk modifier using software nodes.

> +     const struct software_node softnodes[] = {
> +             { .name = "first", },
> +             { .name = "second", .parent = &softnodes[0], },
> +             { .name = "third", .parent = &softnodes[1], },
> +             { NULL /* Guardian */ },
> +     };

> +     test(full_name_second, "%pfw",
> +          software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 3]));
> +     test(full_name, "%pfw",
> +          software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 2]));
> +     test(full_name, "%pfwf",
> +          software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 2]));
> +     test(second_name, "%pfwP",
> +          software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 3]));
> +     test(third_name, "%pfwP",
> +          software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 2]));


These can be shorted and easier to parse if you use absolute indexes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Reply via email to