On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:38:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > In order to reduce the number of credit update messages,
> > we send them only when the space available seen by the
> > transmitter is less than VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |  1 +
> >  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > index 7d973903f52e..49fc9d20bc43 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
> >  
> >     /* Protected by rx_lock */
> >     u32 fwd_cnt;
> > +   u32 last_fwd_cnt;
> >     u32 rx_bytes;
> >     struct list_head rx_queue;
> >  };
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c 
> > b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 095221f94786..a85559d4d974 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(struct 
> > virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
> >  void virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, struct 
> > virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
> >  {
> >     spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
> > +   vvs->last_fwd_cnt = vvs->fwd_cnt;
> >     pkt->hdr.fwd_cnt = cpu_to_le32(vvs->fwd_cnt);
> >     pkt->hdr.buf_alloc = cpu_to_le32(vvs->buf_alloc);
> >     spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
> > @@ -261,6 +262,7 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock 
> > *vsk,
> >     struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
> >     struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> >     size_t bytes, total = 0;
> > +   u32 free_space;
> >     int err = -EFAULT;
> >  
> >     spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > @@ -291,11 +293,19 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock 
> > *vsk,
> >                     virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt);
> >             }
> >     }
> > +
> > +   free_space = vvs->buf_alloc - (vvs->fwd_cnt - vvs->last_fwd_cnt);
> > +
> >     spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> >  
> > -   /* Send a credit pkt to peer */
> > -   virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk, VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> > -                                       NULL);
> > +   /* We send a credit update only when the space available seen
> > +    * by the transmitter is less than VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE
> 
> This is just repeating what code does though.
> Please include the *reason* for the condition.
> E.g. here's a better comment:
> 
>       /* To reduce number of credit update messages,
>        * don't update credits as long as lots of space is available.
>        * Note: the limit chosen here is arbitrary. Setting the limit
>        * too high causes extra messages. Too low causes transmitter
>        * stalls. As stalls are in theory more expensive than extra
>        * messages, we set the limit to a high value. TODO: experiment
>        * with different values.
>        */
> 

Yes, it is better, sorry for that. I'll try to avoid unnecessary comments,
explaining the reason for certain changes.

Since this patch is already queued in net-next, should I send another
patch to fix the comment?

Thanks,
Stefano

Reply via email to