Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, I'm not opposed to keeping the parameter name the same while > making the default 1; I just thought that the name 'alloc_bufs_at_read' was > clearer. Another option is to change it to 'no_alloc_bufs_at_load'. Jon, > any preference there?
I don't think that negating it by adding no_ at the front helps much. In general, I prefer the name it has now, but it's not *that* big a deal. We've probably already expended more bandwidth than it's worth. jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
