On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:24:19PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> There has several code pieces need to know the instruction size, but
> now every place calculates the instruction size separately.
> 
> This patch refactors to create a new function cs_etm__instr_size() as
> a central place to analyze the instruction length based on ISA type
> and instruction value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index b3a5daaf1a8f..882a0718033d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -914,6 +914,26 @@ static inline int cs_etm__t32_instr_size(struct 
> cs_etm_queue *etmq,
>       return ((instrBytes[1] & 0xF8) >= 0xE8) ? 4 : 2;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int cs_etm__instr_size(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> +                                  u8 trace_chan_id,
> +                                  enum cs_etm_isa isa,
> +                                  u64 addr)
> +{
> +     int insn_len;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * T32 instruction size might be 32-bit or 16-bit, decide by calling
> +      * cs_etm__t32_instr_size().
> +      */
> +     if (isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32)
> +             insn_len = cs_etm__t32_instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id, addr);
> +     /* Otherwise, A64 and A32 instruction size are always 32-bit. */
> +     else
> +             insn_len = 4;
> +
> +     return insn_len;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u64 cs_etm__first_executed_instr(struct cs_etm_packet *packet)
>  {
>       /* Returns 0 for the CS_ETM_DISCONTINUITY packet */
> @@ -938,19 +958,23 @@ static inline u64 cs_etm__instr_addr(struct 
> cs_etm_queue *etmq,
>                                    const struct cs_etm_packet *packet,
>                                    u64 offset)
>  {
> +     int insn_len;
> +
>       if (packet->isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32) {
>               u64 addr = packet->start_addr;
>  
>               while (offset > 0) {
> -                     addr += cs_etm__t32_instr_size(etmq,
> -                                                    trace_chan_id, addr);
> +                     addr += cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> +                                                packet->isa, addr);
>                       offset--;
>               }
>               return addr;
>       }
>  
> -     /* Assume a 4 byte instruction size (A32/A64) */
> -     return packet->start_addr + offset * 4;
> +     /* Return instruction size for A32/A64 */
> +     insn_len = cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> +                                   packet->isa, packet->start_addr);
> +     return packet->start_addr + offset * insn_len;

This patch will work but from where I stand it makes things difficult to
understand more than anything else.  It is also adding coupling between function
cs_etm__instr_addr() and cs_etm__instr_size(), meaning the code needs to be
carefully inspected in order to make changes to either one.

Last but not least function cs_etm__instr_size() isn't used in the upcoming
patches.  I really don't see what is gained here. 
 
Thanks,
Mathieu

>  }
>  
>  static void cs_etm__update_last_branch_rb(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> @@ -1090,16 +1114,8 @@ static void cs_etm__copy_insn(struct cs_etm_queue 
> *etmq,
>               return;
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * T32 instruction size might be 32-bit or 16-bit, decide by calling
> -      * cs_etm__t32_instr_size().
> -      */
> -     if (packet->isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32)
> -             sample->insn_len = cs_etm__t32_instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> -                                                       sample->ip);
> -     /* Otherwise, A64 and A32 instruction size are always 32-bit. */
> -     else
> -             sample->insn_len = 4;
> +     sample->insn_len = cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> +                                           packet->isa, sample->ip);
>  
>       cs_etm__mem_access(etmq, trace_chan_id, sample->ip,
>                          sample->insn_len, (void *)sample->insn);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to