On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> we upgraded the kernel of a nfs-server from 2.6.17.11 to 2.6.22.6. Since
> then we get the message
...
Bruce - you're losing authorship information.
Please don't do that.
Put a
From: Wolfgang Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at the top of the email, so that the author gets properly attributed. I
don't know how many of these I've missed - in this case I just ended up
googling for the commit message because the "Signed-off-by:" lines implied
that you weren't the original author, and see the real patch authorship
that way.
But it's *not* the case that the first sign-off is always the author, and
I don't want to need to google for each patch I get, so please make it a
habit to make sure that there's proper attribution for the patches.
Some people (read: Andrew) go so far as to *always* do it (ie Andrew puts
a "From: Andrew Morton .." at the heads of the emails he sends out), and I
appreciate it. That way, even if the email then gets forwarded by somebody
else (because Andrew sent it to some submaintainer instead of me), the
original authorship doesn't get lost when somebody else then forwards the
email.
So that "always explicitly say who the author is" is a good idea, but when
forwarding somebody elses patch, it's *more* than a good idea - at that
point it's absolutely required for proper attribution.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
