On (20/09/07 16:46), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:35:29 +0100
> "James Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > From: James Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > /proc/PID/environ currently truncates at 4096 characters, patch based on 
> > the /proc/PID/mem code.
> 
> patch needs to be carefully reviewed from the security POV (ie: permissions)
> as well as for correctness.  Does anyone have time to do that?
> 
> > Signed-off-by: James Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > --- ./fs/proc/base.c.dist   2007-09-19 12:29:46.244929651 +0100
> > +++ ./fs/proc/base.c        2007-09-19 12:36:18.155648760 +0100
> > @@ -202,27 +202,6 @@ static int proc_root_link(struct inode *
> >      (task->state == TASK_STOPPED || task->state == TASK_TRACED) && \
> >      security_ptrace(current,task) == 0))
> >  
> > -static int proc_pid_environ(struct task_struct *task, char * buffer)
> > -{
> > -   int res = 0;
> > -   struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
> > -   if (mm) {
> > -           unsigned int len;
> > -
> > -           res = -ESRCH;
> > -           if (!ptrace_may_attach(task))
> > -                   goto out;
> > -
> > -           len  = mm->env_end - mm->env_start;
> > -           if (len > PAGE_SIZE)
> > -                   len = PAGE_SIZE;
> > -           res = access_process_vm(task, mm->env_start, buffer, len, 0);
> > -out:
> > -           mmput(mm);
> > -   }
> > -   return res;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int proc_pid_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, char * buffer)
> >  {
> >     int res = 0;
> > @@ -740,6 +719,79 @@ static const struct file_operations proc
> >     .open           = mem_open,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static ssize_t environ_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> > +                   size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > +   struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(file->f_dentry->d_inode);
> > +   char *page;
> > +   unsigned long src = *ppos;
> > +   int ret = -ESRCH;
> > +   struct mm_struct *mm;
> > +   size_t max_len;
> > +
> > +   if (!task)
> > +           goto out_no_task;
> > +
> > +   if (!ptrace_may_attach(task))
> > +           goto out;
> > +
> > +   ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +   page = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_TEMPORARY);
> 
> Now I wonder what inspired you to reach for GFP_TEMPORARY?  Perhaps the
> fact that it is crappily named and undocumented.
> 

Because it's a very short lived allocation? He allocates it here and
frees it at the end of the function again.

> This should be GFP_KERNEL - the page you're allocating here is not
> reclaimable by the VM.
> 

The patch leader documented how this works although you're right in that the
code doesn't explain it adequately. Temporary and short-lived allocations
are grouped with kernel-reclaimable pages such as inode and dcache pages
intentionally.

> > +   if (!page)
> > +           goto out;
> > +
> > +   ret = 0;
> > +
> > +   mm = get_task_mm(task);
> > +   if (!mm)
> > +           goto out_free;
> > +
> > +   max_len = (count > PAGE_SIZE) ? PAGE_SIZE : count;
> > +
> > +   while (count > 0) {
> > +           int this_len, retval;
> > +
> > +           this_len = mm->env_end - (mm->env_start + src);
> > +
> > +           if (this_len <= 0)
> > +                   break;
> > +
> > +           if (this_len > max_len)
> > +                   this_len = max_len;
> > +
> > +           retval = access_process_vm(task, (mm->env_start + src),
> > +                   page, this_len, 0);
> > +
> > +           if (retval <= 0) {
> > +                   ret = retval;
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           if (copy_to_user(buf, page, retval)) {
> > +                   ret = -EFAULT;
> > +                   break;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           ret += retval;
> > +           src += retval;
> > +           buf += retval;
> > +           count -= retval;
> > +   }
> 
> Now that's a funky loop.  Someone please convince me that there is no way
> in which `count - retval' can ever go negative (ie: huge positive).
> 
> 
> > +   *ppos = src;
> > +
> > +   mmput(mm);
> > +out_free:
> > +   free_page((unsigned long) page);
> > +out:
> > +   put_task_struct(task);
> > +out_no_task:
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct file_operations proc_environ_operations = {
> > +   .read           = environ_read,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static ssize_t oom_adjust_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> >                             size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> >  {
> > @@ -2092,7 +2144,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_
> >     DIR("task",       S_IRUGO|S_IXUGO, task),
> >     DIR("fd",         S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, fd),
> >     DIR("fdinfo",     S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, fdinfo),
> > -   INF("environ",    S_IRUSR, pid_environ),
> > +   REG("environ",    S_IRUSR, environ),
> >     INF("auxv",       S_IRUSR, pid_auxv),
> >     INF("status",     S_IRUGO, pid_status),
> >     INF("limits",     S_IRUSR, pid_limits),
> > @@ -2421,7 +2473,7 @@ out_no_task:
> >  static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {
> >     DIR("fd",        S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, fd),
> >     DIR("fdinfo",    S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, fdinfo),
> > -   INF("environ",   S_IRUSR, pid_environ),
> > +   REG("environ",   S_IRUSR, environ),
> >     INF("auxv",      S_IRUSR, pid_auxv),
> >     INF("status",    S_IRUGO, pid_status),
> >     INF("limits",    S_IRUSR, pid_limits),
> 

-- 
-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to