On 9/5/19 2:15 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Instead of invoking struct bpf_prog::bpf_func directly, use the
> BPF_PROG_RUN macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolva...@google.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>

> ---
>   net/kcm/kcmsock.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
> index 5dbc0c48f8cb..f350c613bd7d 100644
> --- a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
> +++ b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int kcm_parse_func_strparser(struct strparser 
> *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
>       struct kcm_psock *psock = container_of(strp, struct kcm_psock, strp);
>       struct bpf_prog *prog = psock->bpf_prog;
>   
> -     return (*prog->bpf_func)(skb, prog->insnsi);
> +     return BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, skb);
>   }
>   
>   static int kcm_read_sock_done(struct strparser *strp, int err)
> 

Reply via email to