Hi,

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 12:26:06PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote:
> On 9/8/19 3:10 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reic...@collabora.com>
> > 
> > nvmem_cell_write's buf argument uses different types based on
> > the configuration of CONFIG_NVMEM. The function prototype for
> > enabled NVMEM uses 'void *' type, but the static dummy function
> > for disabled NVMEM uses 'const char *' instead. Fix the different
> > behaviour by always expecting a 'void *' typed buf argument.
> > 
> > Fixes: 7a78a7f7695b ("power: reset: nvmem-reboot-mode: use NVMEM as reboot 
> > mode write interface")
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Han Nandor <nandor....@vaisala.com>
> > Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reic...@collabora.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
> > index 8f8be5b00060..5c17cb733224 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static inline void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell 
> > *cell, size_t *len)
> >   }
> >   static inline int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
> > -                               const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +                              void *buf, size_t len)
> 
> nitpick: alignment issue?

This actually fixes the alignment issue as a side-effect.
I guess I should have mentioned it in the changelog.

> Review-By: Han Nandor <nandor....@vaisala.com>

I suppose you meant to write "Reviewed-by" instead of inventing your
own tag?

-- Sebastian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to