Shift on s64 is faster than division, use it instead.

As the result of the patch there is a hardly user-visible effect:
poll(), select(), etc syscalls will be a bit more precise on ~2.3%
than before because 1000 != 1024 :)

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <d...@arista.com>
---
 fs/select.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index 12cdefd3be2d..2477c202631e 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -51,15 +51,14 @@
 
 static long __estimate_accuracy(ktime_t slack)
 {
-       int divfactor = 1000;
-
        if (slack < 0)
                return 0;
 
-       if (task_nice(current) > 0)
-               divfactor = divfactor / 5;
+       /* A bit more precise than 0.1% */
+       slack = slack >> 10;
 
-       slack = ktime_divns(slack, divfactor);
+       if (task_nice(current) > 0)
+               slack = slack * 5;
 
        if (slack > MAX_SLACK)
                return MAX_SLACK;
-- 
2.23.0

Reply via email to