On September 10, 2019 7:28:28 AM GMT+01:00, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > >* [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would strongly suggest that we change the term "emulation" to >> "spoofing" for these instructions. We need to explain that we do >*not* >> execute these instructions the was the CPU would have, and unlike the > >> native instructions do not leak kernel information. > >Ok, I've edited the patch to add the 'spoofing' wording where >appropriate, and I also made minor fixes such as consistently >capitalizing instruction names. > >Can I also add your Reviewed-by tag? > >So the patch should show up in tip:x86/asm today-ish, and barring any >complications is v5.4 material. > >Thanks, > > Ingo
Yes, please do. Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <[email protected]> -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
