On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 14:07 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > So I'm inclined to implement option (b), unless someone has strong > > objections. Davide, could I persuade you to help? > > I guess I better do, otherwise you'll continue to stress me ;) > > int timerfd_create(int clockid); > int timerfd_settime(int ufd, int flags, > const struct itimerspec *utmr, > struct itimerspec *otmr); > int timerfd_gettime(int ufd, struct itimerspec *otmr); > > Patch below. Builds, not tested yet (you need to remove the "broken" > status from CONFIG_TIMERFD in case you want to test - and plug the new > syscall to arch/xxx). > May that work for you? > Thomas-san, hrtimer_try_to_cancel() does not touch ->expires and I assume > it'll never do, granted?
Davide-san, I have no intention to change that, but remember there is this file "Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt" :) tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/