On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:02:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:52:16 +0200
> Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> > Heh, I did some grepping and the return value is actually used on
> > three locations:
> > 
> > $> git grep "= printk("  
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:        printed = printk("%s[0x%x]", 
> > name, value);
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                printed += printk(" ");
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                        printed += 
> > printk("%s%s",
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                printed += printk(") ");
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                printed += printk(" ");
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                cur_col = printk("\n%3d 
> > FIFO_USE[0x%x] ", SCB_GET_TAG(scb),
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                cur_col += 
> > printk("SHADDR = 0x%x%x, SHCNT = 0x%x ",
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:                cur_col += 
> > printk("HADDR = 0x%x%x, HCNT = 0x%x ",
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:        printed  = printk("%s[0x%x]", 
> > name, value);
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:                printed += printk(" ");
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:                        printed += 
> > printk("%s%s",
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:                printed += printk(") ");
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:                printed += printk(" ");
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:                cur_col  = 
> > printk("\n%3d ", i);
> > drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_core.c:                cur_col  = 
> > printk("\n%3d ", scb->hscb->tag);

All of those can be removed as none of the returned values are used.
What a mess.

> > drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c:      r = printk("%s" SAS_FMT "ata%u: %s: 
> > %pV",

return value is also ignored, this can be fixed.

> > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:                   len += printk("%*s   %s", 
> > depth, "", usage_str[bit]);
> > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:                   len += printk(KERN_CONT " 
> > at:\n");

That seems to be the only semi-legitimate use, but if it _really_ needs
it, it can just create the string ahead of time, and use the length then
after it printks it out.

> > It is probably not a big deal. For example, lockdep uses the value
> > just for formatting (extra spaces) when printing backtrace.
> > 
> > I agree that it does not make sense to return the value if it
> > complicates the code too much. Well, we will need to count
> > the string length also from another reason (reservation).
> 
> Well, it's being used. I was thinking of dropping it if it was not.
> Let's keep it then.

I think it should be dropped, only one user of the kernel is using it in
a legitimate way, which kind of implies it isn't needed.

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to