On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 17.09.19 21:58, Alexander E. Patrakov (patra...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > I am worried that the getrandom delays will be serialized, because processes > > sometimes run one after another. If there are enough chained/dependent > > processes that ask for randomness before it is ready, the end result is > > still a too-big delay, essentially a failed boot. > > > > In other words: your approach of adding delays only makes sense for heavily > > parallelized boot, which may not be the case, especially for embedded > > systems that don't like systemd. > > As mentioned elsewhere: once the pool is initialized it's > initialized. This means any pending getrandom() on the whole system > will unblock at the same time, and from the on all getrandom()s will > be non-blocking.
He means that all process will experience this delay until there's enough entropy. Willy
