From: Andrew F. Davis <a...@ti.com> commit 66f030eac257a572fbedab3d9646d87d647351fd upstream.
TI-SCI firmware will only respond to messages when the TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED flag is set. Most messages already do this, set this for the ones that do not. This will be enforced in future firmware that better match the TI-SCI specifications, this patch will not break users of existing firmware. Fixes: aa276781a64a ("firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol") Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <a...@ti.com> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> Tested-by: Alejandro Hernandez <ajhernan...@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c @@ -466,9 +466,9 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_get_revision(struc struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer; int ret; - /* No need to setup flags since it is expected to respond */ xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_VERSION, - 0x0, sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr), + TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED, + sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr), sizeof(*rev_info)); if (IS_ERR(xfer)) { ret = PTR_ERR(xfer); @@ -596,9 +596,9 @@ static int ti_sci_get_device_state(const info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle); dev = info->dev; - /* Response is expected, so need of any flags */ xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_GET_DEVICE_STATE, - 0, sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp)); + TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED, + sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp)); if (IS_ERR(xfer)) { ret = PTR_ERR(xfer); dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);