In commit 185be15143aa ("x86/mm: Remove set_pages_x() and set_pages_nx()"),
the wrappers were removed as they did not provide a real benefit over
set_memory_x() and set_memory_nx(). This change causes a problem because
the wrappers were exported, but the underlying routines were not. As a
result, external modules that used the wrappers would need to recreate
a significant part of memory management.

Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <larry.fin...@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Fixes: 185be15143aa ("x86/mm: Remove set_pages_x() and set_pages_nx()")
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
v2 - Subject was messed up
---
 arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index 0d09cc5aad61..755867fc7c19 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -1885,6 +1885,7 @@ int set_memory_x(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
 
        return change_page_attr_clear(&addr, numpages, __pgprot(_PAGE_NX), 0);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_memory_x);
 
 int set_memory_nx(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
 {
@@ -1893,6 +1894,7 @@ int set_memory_nx(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
 
        return change_page_attr_set(&addr, numpages, __pgprot(_PAGE_NX), 0);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_memory_nx);
 
 int set_memory_ro(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
 {
-- 
2.23.0

Reply via email to