Hi Greg, On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:12 AM Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > That's a lot of rewriting :( > > How about at least keeping the file names the same to make it easier to > see what happened here? > > Then send a follow-on patch that just does the rename?
That's still not quite useful tbh, lemme bring the diff stat I wrote in previous email just in case you missed it: <Full diff stat> Kconfig | 79 +- Makefile | 46 +- api.c | 423 ---- api.h | 310 --- blkdev.c | 409 +--- cache.c | 1142 ++++----- config.h | 49 - core.c | 5583 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- core.h | 196 -- core_exfat.c | 1553 ------------ exfat.h | 1309 +++++++---- exfat_fs.h | 417 ---- extent.c | 351 --- fatent.c | 182 -- misc.c | 401 ---- nls.c | 490 ++-- super.c | 5103 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------- upcase.c | 740 ++++++ upcase.h | 407 ---- version.h | 29 - xattr.c | 136 -- 21 files changed, 8186 insertions(+), 11169 deletions(-) <diff-filter=M> Kconfig | 79 +- Makefile | 46 +- blkdev.c | 409 +--- cache.c | 1142 +++++----- core.c | 5583 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- exfat.h | 1309 ++++++++---- nls.c | 490 ++--- super.c | 5103 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 8 files changed, 7446 insertions(+), 6715 deletions(-) These diff stats were taken by removing "exfat_" prefix from the current staging drivers. But if that's still what you want, I'll do it. btw, removing "exfat_" prefix from the current one makes more sense imo. If we add "exfat_" prefix to the new one, we get weird file names like "exfat_core_exfat.c". > And by taking something like this, are you agreeing that Samsung will > help out with the development of this code to clean it up and get it > into "real" mergable shape? Well, I think you got me confused with Namjae. (Yeah Korean names are confusing I know :) ) Namjae (or anyone else from Samsung) should answer that, not me. I just prepared a patch as we were getting nowhere like you mentioned :) > Also, I can't take this patch for this simple reason alone: > Don't delete SPDX lines :) Sorry. I'll add that back for v2. On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:13 AM Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 04:59:20AM +0900, Park Ju Hyung wrote: > > --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h > > +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > You just changed the license of this file. Are you SURE about that? The sdFAT code release explicitly states "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version", so I thought that makes sense: https://github.com/arter97/exfat-linux/commit/d5393c4cbe0e5b50231aacd33d9b5b0ddf46a005 Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
