> On Sep 12, 2019, at 21:10, Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote: > > I also think that, before this series can have my ack, it needs an actual gdb > maintainer to chime in, publicly, and state that they have thought about and > tested the ABI changes and that gdb still works on patched kernels with and > without FSGSBASE enabled. I realize that there were all kinds of > discussions, but they were all quite theoretical, and I think that the actual > patches need to be considered by people who understand the concerns. > Specific test cases would be nice, too. > > Finally, I wrote up some notes here: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes&id=70a7d284989e3539ee84f9d709d6450099f773fb > > I want to make sure that they're accounted for, and that patch should > possibly be applied. The parent (broken link, but should fix itself soon): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes&id=166324e907f8a71c823b41bbc2e1b5bc711532d8 > > may also help understand the relevant code.
Adds GDB folks and here is a link to the patch0 entry in this series for them: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1568318818-4091-1-git-send-email-chang.seok....@intel.com/ Thanks, Chang
